No, there hasn't been any consensus about renaming it. I'm putting it out there as a draft for discussion.
I'll take that as one vote for keeping that line in the charter. Looking forward to other feedback! Chris On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Dick Hardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris, > > I have not seen any consensus to renaming v.Next to 2.x. Having said that, > I don't think this WG needs to have a version does it? > > I think this work would be really useful to the full spectrum of clients. > > -- Dick > > > On 2010-05-31, at 3:27 PM, Chris Messina wrote: > > Mike Jones prepared the initial version of this charter, and I took the > liberty of renaming v.Next to 2.x, and made compatibility with 2.x an > explicit goal of this work. > > I'm reluctant of the applicability of this work to active clients and have > subsequently removed this line: > > · produce user experience guidelines for supporting for a spectrum > of clients, including passive clients per current usage, thin active > clients, and active clients with OP functionality, > > Feedback welcome. > > Chris > * > * > *(a) **Charter**.* > > *(i)* *WG name:* OpenID 2.x User Experience. > > *(ii)* *Purpose:* Produce a user experience specification or family > of specifications for OpenID 2.x that address the limitations and drawbacks > present in the OpenID 2.0 that limit OpenID’s applicability, adoption, > usability, privacy, and security. Specific goals are: > > · produce user experience guidelines for less intrusive > authentication user experiences than full-page browser redirect, > > · produce user experience guidelines for controlled and > uncontrolled release of attributes, > > · produce user experience guidelines for use of identities and > attributes by non-browser applications, > > · produce user experience guidelines for optimized protocol flows > combining authentication, attribute release, and resource authorization, > > · produce user experience guidelines for use of OpenID on mobile > devices, > > · seamlessly integrate with and complement the other OpenID 2.x > specifications. > > > Compatibility with OpenID 2.x is an explicit goal for this work. > > ** > > *(iii)* *Scope:* Produce a current generation OpenID user experience > specification or specifications, consistent with the purpose statement. > > *(iv)* *Proposed List of Specifications*: OpenID 2.x User Experience > and possibly related specifications. > > *(v)* *Anticipated audience or users of the work:* Implementers of > OpenID Providers, Relying Parties, Active Clients, and non-browser > applications utilizing OpenID. > > *(vi)* *Language in which the WG will conduct business*: English. > > *(vii)* *Method of work: *E-mail discussions on the working group > mailing list, working group conference calls, and face-to-face meetings at > the Internet Identity Workshop and OpenID summits. > > *(viii)* *Basis for determining when the work of the WG is completed:* > Work will not be deemed to be complete until there is a consensus that the > resulting protocol specification or family of specifications fulfills the > working group goals. Additional proposed changes beyond that initial > consensus will be evaluated on the basis of whether they increase or > decrease consensus within the working group. The work will be completed > once it is apparent that maximal consensus on the draft has been achieved, > consistent with the purpose and scope. > *(b) **Background Information**.* > > *(i)* *Related work being done in other WGs or organizations*: Draft > User Interface (UI) > Extension<http://wiki.openid.net/OpenID-User-Interface-Work-Group-Proposal>. > Kantara Universal Login Experience (ULX) > <http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/ulx/>working group. RPX > product design <http://rpxnow.com/>. Facebook Authentication > Guidelines<http://developers.facebook.com/docs/authentication/>. > Google user authentication > research<http://sites.google.com/site/oauthgoog/UXFedLogin> > . > > *(ii)* *Proposers:* > Chris Messina, [email protected] (chair) > Dick Hardt, [email protected] > *Additional proposers to be added here* > > *(iii)* *Anticipated Contributions*: None. > > -- > Chris Messina > Open Web Advocate, Google > > Personal: http://factoryjoe.com > Follow me on Buzz: http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina > ...or Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina > > This email is: [ ] shareable [X] ask first [ ] private > > > -- Chris Messina Open Web Advocate, Google Personal: http://factoryjoe.com Follow me on Buzz: http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina ...or Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina This email is: [ ] shareable [X] ask first [ ] private
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
