Regarding the meat of the patch: >- udelay(1); >+ schedule(); > > We're still double-checking this on our ia64 platforms (which were showing 5-10% CPU on that thread).
Doesn't this schedule() call negate the speedup sought by the extra thread in the first place? What about keeping the udelay but making it multiples of HZ? Regards, Rocky Craig HP Open Source and Linux Organization Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
