On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 14:49 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > We need to be able to poll at faster-than-timer-tick rates, yet let > other higher-priority apps run. Hence the schedule(). We're open to > other suggestions, but this seemed minimally intrusive while > accomplishing the goal. No more soft lockups or jittery mice.
at least put a whole bunch of cpu_relax() in that loop, or your cpu will.. get hot. Would also be nice if cpufreq had a "run this one slow" option.... Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
