On 02/29/2016 05:50 PM, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> commit 58c5661f2144 ("panic, x86: Allow CPUs to save registers even
> if looping in NMI context") introduced nmi_panic() which prevents
> concurrent/recursive execution of panic().  It also saves registers
> for the crash dump on x86.
>
> hpwdt driver can call panic() from NMI handler, so replace it with
> nmi_panic().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Mingarelli <[email protected]>
> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
>   drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c |   12 ++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> index 92443c3..fd0486f 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> @@ -496,11 +496,12 @@ static int hpwdt_pretimeout(unsigned int ulReason, 
> struct pt_regs *regs)
>
>       if (!is_icru && !is_uefi) {
>               if (cmn_regs.u1.ral == 0) {
> -                     panic("An NMI occurred, "
> +                     nmi_panic(regs, "An NMI occurred, "
>                               "but unable to determine source.\n");

This message should really be in a single line.
Sure, strictly speaking that should be done in a separate patch,
but since you touch the line you might as well fix it.

> +                     goto handled;

The goto is unnecessary. Just return NMI_HANDLED.

>               }
>       }
> -     panic("An NMI occurred. Depending on your system the reason "
> +     nmi_panic(regs, "An NMI occurred. Depending on your system the reason "
>               "for the NMI is logged in any one of the following "
>               "resources:\n"
>               "1. Integrated Management Log (IML)\n"
> @@ -508,6 +509,13 @@ static int hpwdt_pretimeout(unsigned int ulReason, 
> struct pt_regs *regs)
>               "3. OA Forward Progress Log\n"
>               "4. iLO Event Log");
>
> +handled:
> +     /*
> +      * Returning from nmi_panic() means this CPU was processing panic()
> +      * before NMI.  Return NMI_HANDLED and go back to panic routines.
> +      */

I don't think this comment adds much if any value.

> +     return NMI_HANDLED;
> +
>   out:

Any goto to this label does no longer serve a useful purpose (if it ever served 
one),
and should be replaced with "return NMI_DONE;"

>       return NMI_DONE;
>   }
>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer

Reply via email to