On 02/29/2016 05:50 PM, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> commit 58c5661f2144 ("panic, x86: Allow CPUs to save registers even
> if looping in NMI context") introduced nmi_panic() which prevents
> concurrent/recursive execution of panic(). It also saves registers
> for the crash dump on x86.
>
> hpwdt driver can call panic() from NMI handler, so replace it with
> nmi_panic().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Mingarelli <[email protected]>
> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> index 92443c3..fd0486f 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> @@ -496,11 +496,12 @@ static int hpwdt_pretimeout(unsigned int ulReason,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> if (!is_icru && !is_uefi) {
> if (cmn_regs.u1.ral == 0) {
> - panic("An NMI occurred, "
> + nmi_panic(regs, "An NMI occurred, "
> "but unable to determine source.\n");
This message should really be in a single line.
Sure, strictly speaking that should be done in a separate patch,
but since you touch the line you might as well fix it.
> + goto handled;
The goto is unnecessary. Just return NMI_HANDLED.
> }
> }
> - panic("An NMI occurred. Depending on your system the reason "
> + nmi_panic(regs, "An NMI occurred. Depending on your system the reason "
> "for the NMI is logged in any one of the following "
> "resources:\n"
> "1. Integrated Management Log (IML)\n"
> @@ -508,6 +509,13 @@ static int hpwdt_pretimeout(unsigned int ulReason,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> "3. OA Forward Progress Log\n"
> "4. iLO Event Log");
>
> +handled:
> + /*
> + * Returning from nmi_panic() means this CPU was processing panic()
> + * before NMI. Return NMI_HANDLED and go back to panic routines.
> + */
I don't think this comment adds much if any value.
> + return NMI_HANDLED;
> +
> out:
Any goto to this label does no longer serve a useful purpose (if it ever served
one),
and should be replaced with "return NMI_DONE;"
> return NMI_DONE;
> }
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer