On 02/29/2016 08:23 PM, 河合英宏 / KAWAI，HIDEHIRO wrote: > Hi Corey, > > Thanks for the review. > >> Sure, this is a good idea. >> >> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <[email protected]> >> >> Note that nmi_panic() came in commit 1717f2096b5 (panic, x86: Fix >> re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI) and then the regs field >> was added in the commit you reference. > > Yes. So, I'll change the description to more proper one. > >> Do you want me to add this to the IPMI queue or do you have another >> way to get this patch into the kernel? > > I don't have another way, and I don't know how cross-subsystem > patch set should be handled. > > I think it would be better this patch set is managed by one person > because both PATCH 2/3 and 3/3 depend on 1/3. >
We'll need an Ack from someone with authority over kernel/panic.c. If someone sends an Ack, the series can go through IPMI (or watchdog). It might be easier though if Andrew would take the entire series. Guenter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
