Sorry Tom! Made public (not scheduled until after 8). Richard
On May 31, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Tom Schindl <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> wrote: > the JIRA mentioned is not public - we the e(fx)clipse project are working on > such a feature as well for one of our next releases - so if openjfx does > provide it we could spend our time on other important improvements! > > Tom > > On 31.05.13 19:54, Richard Bair wrote: >>>>> What's so horrid about css to bss compiling? >>>> >>>> A) It's broken >>>> B) What's the point? >>>> >>>> Not trying to be unduly critical but is it for some performance gain or >>>> something? Surely the load time is minimal. Given that I have a dozen XML >>>> config files, a handful of property files and a thousand FXML files that >>>> are being loaded by my app it seems like a whole lot of extra complexity >>>> and space for bugs to crawl in for no gain. Maybe I'm missing some benefit >>>> of this? >>> >>> The benefit is performance. It is much faster to deserialize the binary >>> format than to invoke the parser. >> >> And we're talking orders of magnitude here. And don't forget about iOS / >> Android / PI / Beagle / and friends. We didn't do bss because we thought it >> was cool, I can promise you that. Neither are we looking at compiling FXML >> into class files (RT-23527) for the fun of it ;-). >> >
