Maybe there is a AOT based JavaVM from http://www.excelsior-usa.com/ available soon for iOS...
Am 06.07.2013 um 04:34 schrieb Richard Bair <richard.b...@oracle.com>: > It's complicated. We've prototyped on all kinds of VMs including the CVM used > with ADF mobile and a hacked up Java SE embedded 7. It's a long way from > prototype to product and as I mentioned on my blog we have not announced any > plan around SE embedded VM on iOS / Android. But at least we know that our > port of fx was (mostly) functional and could be successful. > > On Jul 5, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Tobias Bley <t...@ultramixer.com> wrote: > >> Richard, the question is: Has Oracle a hidden Java8 VM for Android and iOS? >> Or how do you test your Android and iOS JavaFX implementation??? >> >> >> Am 05.07.2013 um 16:42 schrieb Richard Bair <richard.b...@oracle.com>: >> >>> We have implementations for Android and iOS that are both functional on a >>> Java 8 VM. It looks like, because the iOS one is so closely related to the >>> Mac build, it was the easiest one to get a build for the open community. >>> We're working on the Android build scripts. The situation on Android is >>> exactly the same as iOS -- we're open sourcing the library code, but not a >>> Java 8 VM. I would expect that if the iOS build on RoboVM works, that the >>> Android build for RoboVM would also work, but I haven't tried it. >>> >>> Richard >>> >>> On Jul 5, 2013, at 5:07 AM, Daniel Zwolenski <zon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Niklas - sounds like there's still a bit to do. >>>> >>>> I'm still a bit confused though, I thought the JFX team were/are giving us >>>> a version of jfx that is specifically designed to work on Android but it >>>> sounds like that's pretty far from the actuality? What will the gradle >>>> build for android actually give us? >>>> >>>> I'd be keen to hear from someone on the jfx side on all of this. Is this >>>> how you planned for your smart device releases to work or has something >>>> gone wrong in the journey here? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 05/07/2013, at 9:57 PM, Niklas Therning <nik...@therning.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> <mime-attachment.txt> >>
