So that this consensus ends up going somewhere, who wants to make this happen?
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Martin Klähn <grazer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > Am 18.10.2013 20:55 schrieb "Scott Palmer" <swpal...@gmail.com>: > >> I propose the codecs be made pluggable. The licensing issue can be left >> to the application developer. >> >> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-2684 >> >> Once that is in place, support for whatever codec you wish can be added. >> FFMPEG could be used as an example. >> I'm against adding any new codecs without first putting in a >> user-extensible codec mechanism that does not require modifying JavaFX to >> support new formats. I.e. make the dog food first, then eat it. >> >> Scott >> >> On 2013-10-18, at 2:03 PM, Kirill Kirichenko <kirill.kiriche...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Media is very regulated area in legal terms. Using different codecs may >> involve using and even violating some license agreements. >>> Anyway you're welcome to propose anything. >>> >>> >>>> On 18.10.2013 21:37, Robert Krüger wrote: >>>> Great news! >>>> >>>> Does this mean that it is now possible to add support for more >>>> demuxers/decoders e.g. by utilizing stuff from other projects (ffmpeg >>>> comes to mind)? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Kirill Kirichenko >>>> <kirill.kiriche...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>>> Hello OpenJFXers ! >>>>> We're happy to announce that Media part of JavaFX is now open source. >>>>> Opensourcing touched all Media component except ON2 FLV demuxer and VP6 >>>>> decoder. The decoder will remain closed. >>>>> >>>>> You're all welcome to contribute. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> K >> >>
