And for the record, I'll be adding a 'dark theme' style option once SB2.0 is a 
little more mature ;-)
Mo

On 19 Nov 2013, at 22:46, Philipp Dörfler <phdoerf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is excellent news! You guys are full of surprise :)
> 
> ~ Philipp
> 
> Am 19.11.2013 um 23:41 schrieb Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>:
> 
>> I see Joe already responded with status (my e-mail crossed his).
>> 
>> -- Kevin
>> 
>> 
>> Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>> Hi Philipp,
>>> 
>>> There is a JIRA filed to track the open sourcing or SceneBuilder:
>>> 
>>> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-34175
>>> 
>>> Someone from the SceneBuilder team can comment on the status of this.
>>> 
>>> -- Kevin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Philipp Dörfler wrote:
>>>> Hello list,
>>>> 
>>>> I can’t but acknowledge the work put into SceneBuilder especially when 
>>>> seeing SceneBuilder 2 who apparently underwent a serious and well done 
>>>> design overhaul (I still want to see a dark theme ;) ). Well done!
>>>> 
>>>> As much as I love the new design the Early Access 2.0 version feels very 
>>>> rough and makes clear that this tool needs a lot of love. I thought about 
>>>> contributing to OpenJFX for quite some time but would actually rather 
>>>> spend time on improving SceneBuilder than working on juicy API internals 
>>>> that are better left to guys that truly know what they do ;) Things like 
>>>> better IDE integration or making the keyframe based animation API 
>>>> accessible in the GUI already (To at least partially get to where JavaFX 1 
>>>> Designer once was or wanted to be) come to my mind.
>>>> 
>>>> As far as I know there are currently no plans of open sourcing Scene 
>>>> Builder but I wondered if there’s even a chance for it and what would be 
>>>> required for that to happen? Seeing that the JFX team probably has a very 
>>>> tight schedule and spent a lot of time open sourcing the core components 
>>>> already I’m afraid that a OSS SceneBuilder would be kind of impossible. Am 
>>>> I too pessimistic?
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> ~ Philipp
> 

Reply via email to