Thanks. Fixed. On 2013-12-18 3:43 PM, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
I think there is a typo in wiki page:M1: January 13, 2013 => M1: January 13, 2014 Best Regards, Ali EbrahimiOn Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Stephen F Northover <steve.x.northo...@oracle.com <mailto:steve.x.northo...@oracle.com>> wrote:Hi all, So the sanity testing was a success. I would not say that the universe has been fundamentally altered because of it but the idea that there is a weekly formal time when we kick the tires of FX is a good one. There were some problems getting the correct bits to test but that will be resolved for next week. We will be doing this next week and for the foreseeable future as it was a good forcing function for people to get their environments up to date and make sure that things were generally working. The big winner as a test case was HelloSanity. Although Ensemble exercises much of FX, some committers found the UI to be somewhat cumbersome for testing. There is so much functionality in Ensemble, that a comprehensive test just takes too long. Ensemble is still very important, but perhaps not the best sanity vehicle. I'm thinking that in future, we will look towards testing the FX toys that have recently been open sourced instead of having so many committers poking Ensemble. Further, we need to add some more 3D testing to the list of apps we run (3DViewer). In order to avoid entering duplicates, on the day of the testing, we won't process outstanding issues so that testers can quickly scan the "One True Dashboard". https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=11893 So we will be sanity testing next Monday the 23rd and after that refining the process as we go. As we approach our first 8u20 milestone, the testing effort will ramp up but we can discuss specifics closer to the date. https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/8u20 Steve
