Yes, this is one of the few things that I just hate about IDEA. On Apr 7, 2014, at 6:00 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote:
> I can't speak to other IntelliJ issues, but the root cause of this particular > one is the same thing that Debbie ran into last week -- IntelliJ doesn't > launch programs using the standard Java launcher. For whatever reason, it > uses its own launcher. This might be worth raising with JetBrains. > > -- Kevin > > > Jonathan Giles wrote: >> Kevin, >> >> Yes, that is the program I used, and yes, I get the 'Toolkit not >> initialized' exception. I am running IntelliJ, so that is the reason. I >> switched over to Eclipse and the code run as expected. >> >> I am slightly bothered by the occasional failures that seem to be >> IntelliJ-specific. I have a gut feeling that it doesn't always run all tests >> (or that it runs them slightly differently to get different results than >> when run on the command line). Does anyone know why this is? >> >> I'm actually most at home in Eclipse, so perhaps I should switch to that as >> my primary IDE for OpenJFX development. >> >> -- Jonathan >> >> On 8/04/2014 11:29 a.m., Kevin Rushforth wrote: >>> Just to make sure we are running the same program, the one I ran to verify >>> that RT-33954 is fixed was the simple test program in the comments of that >>> bug. Here it is (with the imports omitted for brevity). >>> >>> public class Example extends Application { >>> public static void main(String[] args) { >>> //this is called from a static block in javafx.scene.control.Control >>> PlatformImpl.setDefaultPlatformUserAgentStylesheet(); >>> >>> Application.launch(args); >>> } >>> >>> @Override >>> public void start(final Stage primaryStage) throws Exception { >>> } >>> } >>> >>> The above program runs fine for me with no exception. >>> >>> Jonathan: are you seeing something different? Or perhaps running a >>> different example? >>> >>> NOTE: if you run this from IntelliJ it will not work. I verified that with >>> Debbie last week (on a different issue), which may be why you are seeing a >>> problem. Running it from command line, from NB, or from Eclipse works. >>> >>> -- Kevin >>> >>> >>> Jonathan Giles wrote: >>>> Firstly, I agree - this does seem to still be reproducible despite Kevin's >>>> comment that it should have been resolved in JavaFX 8.0 due to RT-28754 >>>> <https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-28754>, so that is troubling. >>>> I'll leave Kevin to comment on that. >>>> >>>> Secondly, RT-33954 was closed as a duplicate of RT-28754 >>>> <https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-28754>, so it would be better to >>>> leave RT-33954 closed and move discussion (including what you recently >>>> posted) into RT-28754 <https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-28754>. The >>>> discussion can start in there and most probably a new bug will need to be >>>> opened (as RT-28754 <https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-28754> did >>>> result in a code change that at one point appears to have fixed the >>>> problem, so we're possibly dealing with a regression). >>>> >>>> Thirdly, whether this is a suitable bug for someone learning the ropes is >>>> debatable. I'll leave Kevin to offer his thoughts, but perhaps you can >>>> propose a patch that resolves this issue for you in your test scenarios. >>>> Also, a good starting point is to develop a simple test application that >>>> helps to demonstrate this issue (preferably the test case is a single >>>> class with no dependencies), and which you can then share in the jira >>>> issue via copy/paste into a comment. >>>> >>>> Fourthly, to be a contributor in the OpenJDK requires you to follow a >>>> process to get the paperwork in order. It is wise to get that started as >>>> soon as possible, as it can sometimes take a while. Here's a link to the >>>> process: http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/ The main thing is the OCA. >>>> >>>> Finally, welcome! :-) >>>> >>>> -- Jonathan >>>> >>>> On 6/04/2014 1:06 p.m., Sandipan Razzaque wrote: >>>>> Hi JavaFX devs! >>>>> >>>>> I was wondering how people felt about re-opening this bug? I don't believe >>>>> it has been fixed (see my comment). >>>>> >>>>> I'm also happy to work on it. But, let me know if you think my time would >>>>> be better spent elsewhere. I'm keen to take on a small bug to just get the >>>>> hang of the process and community (I'll be stumbling with mercurial along >>>>> the way too!). I think this bug is an ideal candidate for someone just >>>>> learning the ropes. >>>>> >>>>> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-33954 >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> SR >>>>> >>>>> Sandipan Razzaque | www.sandipan.net >>>> >>