I've just added some more debug information and for me the values I get are reasonable and the bounds are identical but once the bug is wrong and the next time it is right :-(
> ========== INVALID: privat============ > Caret: [MoveTo[x=9.00146484375, y=105.0], LineTo[x=9.00146484375, y=120.0]] > Text-Bounds: BoundingBox [minX:0.0, minY:0.0, minZ:0.0, width:72.01171875, > height:15.0, depth:0.0, maxX:72.01171875, maxY:15.0, maxZ:0.0] > Wrapping-Width: 0.0 > Text-Flow:BoundingBox [minX:0.0, minY:0.0, minZ:0.0, width:72.01171875, > height:15.0, depth:0.0, maxX:72.01171875, maxY:15.0, maxZ:0.0] > ========== VALID: privat============ > Caret: [MoveTo[x=9.00146484375, y=0.0], LineTo[x=9.00146484375, y=15.0]] > Text-Bounds: BoundingBox [minX:0.0, minY:0.0, minZ:0.0, width:72.01171875, > height:15.0, depth:0.0, maxX:72.01171875, maxY:15.0, maxZ:0.0] > Wrapping-Width: 0.0 > Text-Flow:BoundingBox [minX:0.0, minY:0.0, minZ:0.0, width:72.01171875, > height:15.0, depth:0.0, maxX:72.01171875, maxY:15.0, maxZ:0.0] Jim can you point me to the bug you fixed? Tom On 24.11.14 09:08, Tom Schindl wrote: > The thing I can confirm is that the Text is inside a TextFlow but I'm > fairly unable to provide a test-case because it happens at random times > - I'll try to update to the latest u40 build to see if the fix from Jim > helps me. > > For the time being I was able to work around the problem by adjusting > the PathElements returned to be never larger then the text-elements > height which too me sounds like a reasonable constraint because I can't > think of a situation where the caret should ever be larger than the > Text-Bounds. > > Tom > > On 24.11.14 02:49, Felipe Heidrich wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> Without a reproducible testcase it is hard to see what is happening. Are you >> using Text or TextFlow ? >> For some reason the Text.getImpl_caretShape() seems to think the caret is in >> the 8th line, which seems to indicate there is some line wrapping width set >> when it should not (Jim just fixed a bug in that code last week). >> >> Regards, >> Felipe >> >> >>> On Nov 23, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Tom Schindl <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was debugging a problem in my StyledText-Source editor today and found >>> one of my layout problems is that ListCells (the inner representation of >>> the editor lines is simply ListView) sometime get really strange heights >>> assigned. >>> >>> To display a caret in the UI I'm creating a caret-Shape using >>> Text.getImpl_caretShape but this is causeing my layout problems because >>> under certain conditions the returned cursor is completely wrong. >>> >>> Look for example at the following example. The first line is the bounds >>> of the Text-Element with the content (privata) and the 2nd is the Path >>> created by Text.getImpl_caretShape >>> >>>> BoundingBox [minX:0.0, minY:0.0, minZ:0.0, width:81.01318359375, >>>> height:15.0, depth:0.0, maxX:81.01318359375, maxY:15.0, maxZ:0.0] >>>> privata ===> [MoveTo[x=9.00146484375, y=120.0], LineTo[x=9.00146484375, >>>> y=135.0]] >>> >>> the correct path is [MoveTo[x=9.00146484375, y=0.0], >>> LineTo[x=9.00146484375, y=15.0]] >>> >>> >>> I've been able to work around this problem for the time being. Anyone an >>> idea what is causing this completely invalid caretShape? >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> -- >>> Thomas Schindl, CTO >>> BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH >>> Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruck >>> http://www.bestsolution.at/ >>> Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck >> > > -- Thomas Schindl, CTO BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruck http://www.bestsolution.at/ Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
