Or GroovyFX
From: Werner Lehmann <lehm...@media-interactive.de> To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net, Date: 03/05/2015 10:56 AM Subject: Re: QML vs. FXML Sent by: "openjfx-dev" <openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> Like this? http://wiki.eclipse.org/Efxclipse/Tooling/FXGraph On 05.03.2015 16:23, Doug Schaefer wrote: > You really want to use a domain specific language that’s easy to read > and write. QML is that. I find XML tags overwhelm the rest of the > text making it hard to understand what’s going on, and hard to write > unless you have a good XML editor. QML has less cruft and it’s > easier to see what’s happening with a quick glance. NOTICE from Ab Initio: This email (including any attachments) may contain information that is subject to confidentiality obligations or is legally privileged, and sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege. If received in error, please notify the sender, delete this email, and make no further use, disclosure, or distribution.
