My two cents would be that maintaining a UI builder is an awful lot of work, while I expect that a lot of programmers won't be using SB because it always has limitations. Either with complex layouts or custom controls. "Real" programmers probably use FXML directly or even just code it in Java. So the "return on investment" probably is fairly low and thus the resources can be much better spent on the core. IMHO.
On 5-3-2015 02:34, Mike Hearn wrote:
I agree that SB is probably something that can be well maintained by the community at this point, especially with commercial backing from Gluon
