The question is: How does perform JavaFX in comparison to e.g. Xamarian? > Am 19.04.2016 um 13:14 schrieb Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com>: > > >> On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:18 AM, Felix Bembrick <felix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Let's face it, without highly optimised AOT, Java and/or JavaFX on mobiles >> is simply not viable which in turn implies that JavaFX itself is not even >> worth looking at... RIP. > > Let's not go crazy. JavaFX is still the best bet for desktop apps. Despite > all the hype desktop apps aren't going away. Browser-based apps and > JavaScript are still garbage in comparison to what JavaFX offers. > > > Scott
- What does this mean for the future of JavaFX on iOS? Felix Bembrick
- Re: What does this mean for the future of JavaFX on iO... Steve Hannah
- Re: What does this mean for the future of JavaFX o... Johan Vos
- Re: What does this mean for the future of Java... Felix Bembrick
- Re: What does this mean for the future of ... Erik De Rijcke
- Re: What does this mean for the futur... Felix Bembrick
- Re: What does this mean for the f... Sven Reimers
- Re: What does this mean for the future of Java... Tobi
- Re: What does this mean for the future of ... Felix Bembrick
- Re: What does this mean for the futur... Scott Palmer
- Re: What does this mean for the f... Tobi
- Re: What does this mean for the f... Felix Bembrick
- Re: What does this mean for the future of JavaFX on iO... Felix Bembrick
- Re: What does this mean for the future of JavaFX o... Steve Hannah
- Re: What does this mean for the future of Java... Felix Bembrick