Are you using nodes, transitions, effects and animations? Or are you using the Canvas node only?
> On 22 Jul 2016, at 07:33, Hervé Girod <herve.gi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I really don't understand all this. We use Java FX 8 in a graphic framework > where we need high performance (prototyping Cockpit Display Systems with > dynamic Maps and Head Up Displays), and we find that JavaFX performance is > pretty good our use case. For example, Qt / QML performance is far worse in > our POV, for no real additional simplicity of usage for big projects. We also > used OpenGL before (used JOGL), but (at least for our own usage) what > additional performance benefits we could maybe achieve were not worth the > amount of work we would have needed to get them (if we had any). > > Hervé > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 21 juil. 2016, at 23:09, Felix Bembrick <felix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, well I think this the problem: >> >> 1) Going on history, it would be a best case scenario for Java 10 to be >> released in 2020 (but more likely 2021). >> >> 2) With JavaFX, we are already "behind the game" (pun intended). >> >> 3) JavaFX itself has evolved much slower than its competitors. >> >> 4) Technology in general will have moved ahead by massive leaps by 2021 >> (including our competitors). >> >> 5) If the *first* optimised JavaFX scene graph is not released until 2021, I >> genuinely fear that not only would "the ship have sailed" but, it would >> actually be way over the horizon and completely out of sight. >> >> Felix >> >>> On 22 Jul 2016, at 06:51, dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> There is no JDK 10 Project in OpenJDK yet, so there has been no proposed >>> schedule for it yet. >>> >>> cheers, >>> dalibor topic >>> >>>> On 21.07.2016 20:51, Felix Bembrick wrote: >>>> What is a "ball park" figure (i.e. around the 6-9 month granularity if >>>> possible) for the the release date for JDK 10? >>>> >>>>> On 22 Jul 2016, at 04:42, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Oh, I was agreeing with the analysis of what *would* need to be done. I >>>>> am not saying that I think it *should* be done, given resources other >>>>> priorities, etc. Having said that, as I mentioned in an earlier post a >>>>> month or so ago, we will be collecting ideas for possible JDK 10 features >>>>> once JDK 9 is finished. Perhaps this could go into the bucket of things >>>>> to consider, but it isn't something I would think would be high on the >>>>> list....compared to, say, WebGL, some sort of interop with native >>>>> rendering, updated graphics pipelines (we're current stuck on DX 9 and GL >>>>> 2), public API for UI Controls Behaviors, etc. >>>>> >>>>> -- Kevin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Felix Bembrick wrote: >>>>>> Well, I'm putting my hand up for this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kevin, would you like to discuss this with me on or offline? >>>>>> >>>>>> Felix >>>>>> >>>>>> P.S. Thanks Markus for your insight! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 22 Jul 2016, at 04:22, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yep.
