Hi Kevin,

I had already expected something like this (while I did not know the process in 
detail). It's definitely not an urgent thing, postponing it will not block 
other work. I already investigated it now, because applying it would probably 
make things easier when fixing other issues related to FXCanvas.

Best Regards,

> Am 22.09.2016 um 14:21 schrieb Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>:
> Hi Alexander,
> Since this is an enhancement, it needs to go through the FC extension process 
> indicated here:
> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/fc-extension-process
> First and foremost, we will need to assess the impact of the change and 
> whether this is the right time to consider such a change. I note that since 
> this does not add additional functionality, but just refactors existing 
> functionality to be easier to maintain, we might at least consider it when/if 
> the recently announced schedule slip for JDK 9 becomes effective.
> -- Kevin
> Alexander Nyssen wrote:
>> Hallo Kevin, Alexander Z, Vadim,
>> I have created an initial patch for the replacement of AbstractEvents with 
>> direct usage of JavaFX representations:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166242 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anyssen/8166242/webrev.00/
>> Best Regards,
>> Alexander

Reply via email to