Hi Michael, all, Just want to state my support for Michael's "Direct backed WritableImage". Having a way to do natively-backed rendering is IMO the most important feature still missing from FX. This is an area where QT is still way ahead with it's OpenGL/OpenGL ES integration.
Having something like a direct-WritableImage implementation would also make it easier to implement a video viewer using native decoder libs. Personally I find this approach much more powerful than the existing FX 3D and media streaming features, which are (especially 3D) limited in their capabilities. I will be at JavaOne this year, so if there is any interest in meeting up and talking JavaFX I'm in! Best regards, Sten Nordström On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 at 22.41 Michael Hoffer <i...@michaelhoffer.de> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, hi all, > > I would like to bring up the "WritableImage backed by DirectBuffer" > discussion again: >