Hi Kevin, I didn't see any opinions after a week. Please look at the webrev for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130379 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nlisker/8130379/webrev.00/ I'm still slightly in favor of having the 2D and 3D center methods, but the webrev does not contain them. Thanks, Nir On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Nir, > > This seems like a simple enough RFE, and I am not aware of anyone else > working on it, nor any barriers that would make it difficult. > > As with any RFE that adds API (or implements a new feature) the API > additions will need to be approved first. Currently we use the CSR process > [1][2], but we will want to change that at some point. Note that as > indicated in the "More community participation in JavaFX" thread [3], new > API / new features will still have a higher bar for acceptance than bug > fixes. > > Also, any new feature needs to be accompanied by API docs and tests. > > Thanks! > > -- Kevin > > [1] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/csr/Main > [2] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/csr/CSR+FAQs > [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-Febr > uary/021335.html > > > > > Nir Lisker wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to work on https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130379, >> which adds convenience API to the Bounds class. Any comments? >> >> - Nir >> >> >
