Exactly. The current naming was recommended by the jigsaw team, and I
fully agree.
-- Kevin
On 5/8/2018 12:53 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
We have discussed this internally and we believe that
"unsupportedness" is the critical property here so it justifies
grouping them in the same "unsupported" namespace rather than desktop
namespace.
Regards
Prasanta
On 5/8/2018 12:56 PM, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
Hi,
What about " jdk.desktop.unsupported" for new module name?
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan
<prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com
<mailto:prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Modified webrev to rename to InteropProviderImpl
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/fxswing.10/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epsadhukhan/fxswing.10/>
Regards
Prasanta
On 5/7/2018 8:35 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
That name seems good to me.
-- Kevin
On 5/7/2018 8:01 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Would InteropProviderImpl sound good?
Regards
Prasanta
On 5/7/2018 8:27 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 07/05/2018 10:26, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
:
Modified webrev to use InteropProvider
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/fxswing.9/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epsadhukhan/fxswing.9/>
This looks okay although for consistent then
InteropImpl could be renamed too.
-Alan
--
Best Regards,
Ali Ebrahimi
