I see, sorry about the false flag. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Kevin Rushforth < [email protected]> wrote:
> I was somewhat imprecise. That should have read: > > We still expect to do a release of JavaFX 11 around the same time as JDK > 11, but using a different **JBS release version** will help track the > actual content of JavaFX 11 separately from JDK 11. > > > The JavaFX version is still 11 as reported by the value of the system > property "javafx.version" and in the names of the release bundles. No > changes are needed. We are just prefixing the release value in JBS with > "openjfx" before the "11" to distinguish it from the JDK 11 release. > > After JavaFX 11, we could have a discussion on whether to make the next > version "12" or something else. > > -- Kevin > > > On 5/18/2018 12:05 PM, Nir Lisker wrote: > > We still expect to do a release of JavaFX 11 around the same time as JDK >> 11, but using a different release number will help track the actual content >> of JavaFX 11 separately from JDK 11. > > > Iv'e just realized that not releasing JavaFX with version number 11 will > cause confusion with all the '@since 11' tags. We could search for all > '@since 11' and replace them with the new version number (maybe much to the > confusion of users since it breaks continuity). > > - Nir > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Kevin Rushforth < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I wanted to update you on the progress of the last couple weeks on the >> OpenJFX project: >> >> 1. As mentioned last week, we now have EA builds of OpenJFX 11 on >> java.net [1]. We intend to update this roughly weekly. Currently the >> build numbers match the corresponding JDK build number, but that will not >> necessarily be the case going forward, so don't assume that they are in >> sync. >> >> 2. Barring any build or staging issues, this week's OpenJFX 11 EA build >> will include the jmods as mentioned earlier [2] [3] >> >> 3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with >> jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. >> >> 4. After jdk-11+14 is posted on java.net, and FX is no longer included >> in JDK 11, we will start using openjfx-11 as the fix version in JBS to >> distinguish it from JDK 11. We still expect to do a release of JavaFX 11 >> around the same time as JDK 11, but using a different release number will >> help track the actual content of JavaFX 11 separately from JDK 11. >> >> 5. Once this settles down, possibly later this week, I hope to restart >> the discussion about OpenJFX policies, etc. I also hope to be a bit more >> responsive over the coming days / weeks than I have been for the last 3-4 >> weeks. Getting the standalone OpenJFX working and removing JavaFX from the >> JDK was quite time consuming as you can probably imagine. >> >> If you have any general comments or questions about any of this, please >> reply to this thread. We may want to split out more detailed discussions >> into their own thread to make it easier to follow. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> [1] http://jdk.java.net/openjfx/ >> >> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-May/ >> 021856.html >> [3] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202368 >> >> > >
