Hi Steve,
I don't know if this discussion already comes up but I didn't found
any related answers.
Is there a self-defined goal about the compability of versions OpenJFX
and the OracleJDK LTS versions?
E.g. OpenJFX will be compatible to OracleJDK 11 until the next LTS
version of Oracle will be released
That's an excellent question. While I might expect OpenJFX 12 to stop
running on JDK 10 at some point (JDK 10 is EOLed by JDK 11, and dropping
support for it would allow us to get rid of the old swing interop
implementation and build logic), having it run on JDK 11 is a
requirement: At a minimum we will need to run on the latest released
version at any point, since we are no longer bundled. Beyond that, it's
up for discussion among the OpenJFX community: I can see value in
allowing, say, OpenJFX 13 or 14 to continue to run with JDK 11 LTS, but
there is also a cost to doing so, both in terms of testing and also in
either avoiding new JDK features or using reflection or other techniques
to optionally use them.
What do others think?
-- Kevin
On 7/27/2018 6:43 AM, Steve Hruda wrote:
Hi Kevin,
at the moment it's not really a use-case. I didn't used the jmods
because I test if the maven artifacts could easier our life in case of
maintaining different product versions.
I love the easy distribution of the maven artifacts across different
machines (developers & build servers).
But so far I'm not sure if I the maven artifacts bring me a real
benefit compared to the jmod's.
Off-Topic:
I don't know if this discussion already comes up but I didn't found
any related answers.
Is there a self-defined goal about the compability of versions OpenJFX
and the OracleJDK LTS versions?
E.g. OpenJFX will be compatible to OracleJDK 11 until the next LTS
version of Oracle will be released
Best Regards,
Steve
Kevin Rushforth <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> schrieb am Do., 26. Juli 2018, 14:42:
Hi Steve,
Seems it will be an easy bug for Johan to fix, but I'm curious
about how
you created your custom image. The jmods are more suitable for that
approach, since their purpose is to be used with jlink to create a
custom image, in which case the native libraries will be linked
into the
image. Maybe I'm missing some use case, though.
-- Kevin
On 7/26/2018 2:46 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> That looks like a bug. The libPrefix and libSuffix are indeed
not set in
> cases where usingModules is true, which is only the case when
the jrt
> protocol is used.
> It seems to me the prefix/suffix should always be computed. It
doesn't look
> right that they are computed inside the loadLibraryFullPath. But
it looks
> even worse that the "reallib" is calculated based on statements
that might
> not be reached, where it could have used System.mapLibraryName()
>
> I'll create an issue and a PR to fix this.
>
> Thanks for reporting,
>
> - Johan
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:03 AM Steve Hruda
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I created a custom runtime image (windows x64) for my JavaFX
application
>> and used the OpenJFX 11-ea+19 maven artifacts.
>>
>> I get the following exception if I try to execute my application:
>>
>> Graphics Device initialization failed for : d3d, sw
>> Error initializing QuantumRenderer: no suitable pipeline found
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error
initializing
>> QuantumRenderer: no suitable pipeline found
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer.getInstance(QuantumRenderer.java:280)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumToolkit.init(QuantumToolkit.java:222)
>> at
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.Toolkit.getToolkit(Toolkit.java:260)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:263)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:157)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.startToolkit(LauncherImpl.java:658)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplicationWithArgs(LauncherImpl.java:409)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplication(LauncherImpl.java:363)
>> at
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> at
java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/sun.launcher.LauncherHelper$FXHelper.main(LauncherHelper.java:941)
>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error initializing
QuantumRenderer:
>> no suitable pipeline found
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer$PipelineRunnable.init(QuantumRenderer.java:94)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer$PipelineRunnable.run(QuantumRenderer.java:124)
>> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
>> Exception in thread "main"
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>> at
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> at
java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/sun.launcher.LauncherHelper$FXHelper.main(LauncherHelper.java:941)
>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: No toolkit found
>> at
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.Toolkit.getToolkit(Toolkit.java:272)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:263)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:157)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.startToolkit(LauncherImpl.java:658)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplicationWithArgs(LauncherImpl.java:409)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplication(LauncherImpl.java:363)
>> ... 5 more
>>
>>
>> -Djavafx.verbose=true shows that JavaFX isn't able to load the
native libs
>> from the javafx-graphics jar.
>>
>>
>> I debugged the NativeLibLoader and loadLibraryFromResource and
>> installLibraryFromResource will be executed which is ok. But the
>> *reallib *value for
>> all dll's is wrong because of the empty *libSuffix*.
>>
>> e.g. the reallib value of *api-ms-win-core-console-l1-1-0* is
>> */api-ms-win-core-console-l1-1-0* and not
>> */api-ms-win-core-console-l1-1-0.dll*
>>
>> Is it intentional that *libPrefix *& *libSuffix *will not be
set in case of
>> the jrt protocol ?
>>
>>
>>
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/blob/c168ab56accd7e74d53737bc0832495dbc318e52/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/glass/utils/NativeLibLoader.java#L308
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdkjfx/blob/c168ab56accd7e74d53737bc0832495dbc318e52/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/glass/utils/NativeLibLoader.java#L338
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Steve
>>
Kevin Rushforth <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> schrieb am Do., 26. Juli 2018, 14:42:
Hi Steve,
Seems it will be an easy bug for Johan to fix, but I'm curious
about how
you created your custom image. The jmods are more suitable for that
approach, since their purpose is to be used with jlink to create a
custom image, in which case the native libraries will be linked
into the
image. Maybe I'm missing some use case, though.
-- Kevin
On 7/26/2018 2:46 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> That looks like a bug. The libPrefix and libSuffix are indeed
not set in
> cases where usingModules is true, which is only the case when
the jrt
> protocol is used.
> It seems to me the prefix/suffix should always be computed. It
doesn't look
> right that they are computed inside the loadLibraryFullPath. But
it looks
> even worse that the "reallib" is calculated based on statements
that might
> not be reached, where it could have used System.mapLibraryName()
>
> I'll create an issue and a PR to fix this.
>
> Thanks for reporting,
>
> - Johan
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:03 AM Steve Hruda
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I created a custom runtime image (windows x64) for my JavaFX
application
>> and used the OpenJFX 11-ea+19 maven artifacts.
>>
>> I get the following exception if I try to execute my application:
>>
>> Graphics Device initialization failed for : d3d, sw
>> Error initializing QuantumRenderer: no suitable pipeline found
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error
initializing
>> QuantumRenderer: no suitable pipeline found
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer.getInstance(QuantumRenderer.java:280)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumToolkit.init(QuantumToolkit.java:222)
>> at
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.Toolkit.getToolkit(Toolkit.java:260)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:263)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:157)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.startToolkit(LauncherImpl.java:658)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplicationWithArgs(LauncherImpl.java:409)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplication(LauncherImpl.java:363)
>> at
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> at
java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/sun.launcher.LauncherHelper$FXHelper.main(LauncherHelper.java:941)
>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error initializing
QuantumRenderer:
>> no suitable pipeline found
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer$PipelineRunnable.init(QuantumRenderer.java:94)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer$PipelineRunnable.run(QuantumRenderer.java:124)
>> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
>> Exception in thread "main"
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>> at
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> at
java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:564)
>> at
>>
>>
java.base/sun.launcher.LauncherHelper$FXHelper.main(LauncherHelper.java:941)
>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: No toolkit found
>> at
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.Toolkit.getToolkit(Toolkit.java:272)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:263)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:157)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.startToolkit(LauncherImpl.java:658)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplicationWithArgs(LauncherImpl.java:409)
>> at
>>
>>
javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplication(LauncherImpl.java:363)
>> ... 5 more
>>
>>
>> -Djavafx.verbose=true shows that JavaFX isn't able to load the
native libs
>> from the javafx-graphics jar.
>>
>>
>> I debugged the NativeLibLoader and loadLibraryFromResource and
>> installLibraryFromResource will be executed which is ok. But the
>> *reallib *value for
>> all dll's is wrong because of the empty *libSuffix*.
>>
>> e.g. the reallib value of *api-ms-win-core-console-l1-1-0* is
>> */api-ms-win-core-console-l1-1-0* and not
>> */api-ms-win-core-console-l1-1-0.dll*
>>
>> Is it intentional that *libPrefix *& *libSuffix *will not be
set in case of
>> the jrt protocol ?
>>
>>
>>
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/blob/c168ab56accd7e74d53737bc0832495dbc318e52/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/glass/utils/NativeLibLoader.java#L308
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdkjfx/blob/c168ab56accd7e74d53737bc0832495dbc318e52/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/glass/utils/NativeLibLoader.java#L338
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Steve
>>
