On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:26:31 GMT, Hadzic Samir <shad...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:22:11 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg <faste...@openjdk.org> 
> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 06:13:48 GMT, Hadzic Samir <shad...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Allright, this is a fix for JDK-8207957
>>> 
>>> ----------------
>>> 
>>> Commits:
>>>  - 969ebb51: Fixing TableColumnHeaderTest
>>>  - 9d379619: Removing Tablecolumnbasehelper
>>>  - 4fe020fc: Fix javadoc for TableColumnHeader
>>>  - c422c80f: Minor modification and uni test added.
>>>  - b2bdfb5b: Change resizeColumn to protected without static in order to be 
>>> able to override
>>>  - 3b9b7903: Second option for resizeColumnToFitContent in TableColumnHeader
>>>  - d91c56e5: First attempt to extract resizeColumnToFitContent
>>> 
>>> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/6/files
>>>  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/6/webrev.00
>>>   Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207957
>>>   Stats: 523 lines in 4 files changed: 330 ins; 187 del; 6 mod
>>>   Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/6.diff
>>>   Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/6/head:pull/6
>> 
>> modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/skin/TableColumnHeader.java
>>  line 600:
>> 
>>> 599:      * expensive if the number of rows is large. Subclass can either 
>>> call this method or override it (no need to call
>>> 600:      * {@code super()}) to provide their custom algorithm.
>>> 601:      *
>> 
>> see 
>> https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/289#discussion_r245482213 - 
>> I think I made a suggestion (that probably needs some native speaker's fine 
>> tuning :)
> 
> Allright @kleopatra , I have indeed removed the TableColumn argument. It is 
> clearer now that we are resizing the TableColumn of the header.
> 
> I have updated the description a bit but really I'm really not good at method 
> description so I'm open to all suggestions..

A Draft CSR was filed here: 
[JDK-8215554](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215554). It will need 
to be updated once the API review is complete.

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/6

Reply via email to