On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:48:45 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> We have a few performance tests in apps/performance, but I don't know how up >> to date they are. They might give you a >> starting point on how to measure FPS, but really the harder part is going to >> be coming up with a workload -- a scene >> with a number of Shape3Ds with large triangles (so that they are fill-rate >> limited) and 1-3 lights, etc -- that you can >> use to measure rendering performance without measuring overhead. Typically >> you want a scene that is rendering >> continuously in the < 30 fps range, and more like 10 fps to minimize the >> overhead even more. Before we figure out >> whether we need to double the number of shaders (which was one of the ideas >> that I had as well), we need to know how >> much of a problem it is. Is it < 2% performance drop on typical cases on a >> variety of machines or it is a 25% drop (or >> more likely somewhere in between). If the perf drop is negligible, then it >> isn't worth doubling the shaders. If it is >> significant, then we probably need to. If we do need to double the shaders, >> I wouldn't do it based on the maxRange >> being infinite, rather I would do it based on whether attenuation is being >> used. That way the existing shaders would be >> unchanged, while the new shader would deal with both attenuation and the >> maxRange test. Hopefully, there won't be >> enough of a perf hit to require doubling the shaders, but we need to be able >> to measure it. For functional testing, in >> addition to the simple API tests, we want to make sure that the basic >> rendering is working with and without >> attenuation. Some sort of visual test where you verify that attenuation is / >> isn't happening as well as testing the >> cutoff. I wouldn't get too fancy with these...just a sanity test. > > Looks like the `jcheck` bot removed the `rfr` label because the CSR isn't > complete. An incomplete CSR should be treated > the same way as an insufficient number of reviewers. I filed > [SKARA-262](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/SKARA-262) to track this. @kevinrushforth Can you have a look at the test app? I would like to get this moving so we would have time to get the rest of the lighting enhancements into 15. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/43