On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:31:18 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'll attach the above modified testcase that I ran. I ran it on a relatively >> new Windows 10 laptop and a rather ancient >> MacBook Pro. I had to drastically reduce the number of quads on the Mac, but >> the results are similar: no significant >> difference between the current code and the proposed patch for point lights >> (without attenuation). I'd like to see >> results on a recent machine with a graphics accelerator (either NVIDIA or >> AMD/ATI) to see if the new shader hurts >> performance there, but I suspect it will be fine. > > Updated test case: > [attenTest2.zip](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/files/4332937/attenTest2.zip) On Win 10 with an AMD RX 470 4GB I get the following: Without the patch: 200 quads average 113 fps 5000 quads average 11.5 fps With the patch: 200 quads average 106 fps fps 5000 quads average 8.5 fps Will test on Ubuntu later. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/43
