On Tue, 26 May 2020 21:12:07 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Mostly refactoring in preparation of the upcoming fixes. The changes might
>> look like a lot, but it's mostly rearranging
>> of methods. Summery of changes:
>> ### Animation
>> * Added `isNearZero` and `areNearEqual` methods that deal with `EPSILON`
>> checks.
>> * Added `isStopped`, `isRunning` and `isPaused` convenience methods.
>> * Added `runHandler` method to deal with running the handler.
>> * Moved methods to be grouped closer to where they are used rather than by
>> visibility.
>> * Removed the static import for `TickCalculation`.
>> * Various small subjective readability changes.
>> * Behavioral changes: switching `autoReverse` and `onFinished` properties
>> from "Simple" to "Base" properties; and lazily
>> initializing the `cuePoints` map.
>>
>> ### Clip Envelopes
>> * Added `MultiLoopClipEnvelope` as an intermediate parent for infinite and
>> finite clip envelopes.
>> * Rearranged methods order to be consistent.
>> * Replaced the `checkBounds` method with a new overload of `Utils.clamp`.
>> * Renamed `pos` to `cyclePos`.
>> * Extracted common methods: `changedDirection` and `ticksRateChange`
>> * Added internal documentation.
>>
>> Also corrected a typo in `TicksCalculation` and added an explanation for an
>> animation test.
>
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/animation/Animation.java line
> 332:
>
>> 331: }
>> 332: if (isNearZero(newRate)) {
>> 333: if (isRunning()) {
>
> The code from here to the end of the method used to be in an `else` block of
> the `if (isRunningEmbedded())` test. It
> will now be run even if that test is true. Was this intended, and if so, why?
If the test for `isRunningEmbedded()` passes, the method will throw an
exception.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/196
