On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:46:27 GMT, Frederic Thevenet <ftheve...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Not yet. I took a quick look, and this is helpful in pointing out where the >> problem is, but I don't know whether it is the right solution to simply >> round the transform values when rendering the cache to the screen. > > Hi, > > Is there anything I can do to help get this moving forward again? > > As mentioned before, I agree the proposed fix might be simply be addressing > the symptoms rather than the root cause and I'm willing to keep working on it > but I'd really appreciate a second opinion and some insights as to where to > direct my attention if this fix proves to be not enough. > > For what it's worth, I've been living with this fix on my dev machine for a > while now, and it does provide the expected relief to the underlying issue, > without me noticing any obvious regressions, neither visually nor > performance-wise (I haven't run any targeted benchmarks, though). > > With JDK-8199592 fixed, I think it'd be great if we could tackle all of the > scaling issues in 16 (might be getting a bit late now, though) I hope to take a look at this, along with other pending reviews, early next week. There is still some time to get this into 16 if we can find a robust fix. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/308
