On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:17:59 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Changes requested by nlisker (Reviewer). > > A couple other comments: > > 1. Previous release notes were sorted first by subcomponent and then by bug > ID. You might consider whether to do that again for 16? > 2. The following bug was called out during the CSR as needing a release note > to highlight the new log warning: > [JDK-8256362](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256362): JavaFX must > warn when the javafx.* modules are loaded from the classpath > I think I'm on the hook for that one, so I can provide you the proposed text > later today, in case you want to include it. For the last couple releases, I generated the list of bugs to add to release notes, and yes, I typically exclude backports for that reason (it isn't perfect, but it also excludes the issues labeled with the `hgupdate-sync` label, which can be added to indicate an issue synced in from a prior release). Here is the same filter I used in the past, updated for JavaFX 16 for comparison: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?filter=40381 You'll notice that it excludes test bugs and build issue (so the "GitHub Actions" bugs don't show up, for example) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/414
