On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:12:40 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> For the last couple releases, I generated the list of bugs to add to release >> notes, and yes, I typically exclude backports for that reason (it isn't >> perfect, but it also excludes the issues labeled with the `hgupdate-sync` >> label, which can be added to indicate an issue synced in from a prior >> release). >> >> Here is the same filter I used in the past, updated for JavaFX 16 for >> comparison: >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?filter=40381 >> >> You'll notice that it excludes test bugs and build issue (so the "GitHub >> Actions" bugs don't show up, for example) > > Below is the release note for the warning, taken from [this release note > sub-task](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8262948): > > --- > > ### JavaFX runtime logs a warning if javafx.* modules are loaded from the > classpath > > The JavaFX classes must be loaded from a set of named `javafx.*` modules on > the _module path_. Loading the JavaFX classes from the classpath is not > supported. The JavaFX runtime logs a warning at startup if the JavaFX classes > are not loaded from the expected named module. See > [JDK-8256362](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256362) for more > information. I also missed noticing that the following bug is marked with the need for a release note: [JDK-8196079](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196079): Remove obsolete Pisces rasterizer I'll create one shortly and add a comment to this PR when done. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/414
