> > (Though to be honest for my larger projects most of the time this stuff is > set in a style sheet. It’s smaller tools and utilities that I find this > particularly tedious as the verbosity of the code becomes annoying.) >
This was exactly my original question. If people use css most for most cases, what do the small tools and utilities use? Width I can understand, but is radius common enough for simple cases? On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:47 PM Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for having a variant that takes a width. Colour, width, and radius are > the main parameters I need, so a variant that takes all three would help: > > Border.stroke(Paint p, double width, double radii) > > (Though to be honest for my larger projects most of the time this stuff is > set in a style sheet. It’s smaller tools and utilities that I find this > particularly tedious as the verbosity of the code becomes annoying.) > > Scott > > > On Jun 8, 2021, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > > > I think that the convenience methods should just cover the most common > cases, so I'd rather skip the dotted and dashed variants. It is a good > question as to whether there ought to be a variant that takes width. I > wouldn't do that as the only method, though. I'd lean towards not taking > the width. Once you start getting into more parameters you can just use the > constructors without much more trouble. > > > > As for the names, I have a slight preference for Border.stroke and > Background.fill. > > > > -- Kevin > > > > > > On 6/8/2021 4:25 AM, Nir Lisker wrote: > >> Are dashed and dotted used frequently? I find that I only use solid > unless I'm doing something fancy. > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 5:21 AM Michael Strauß <michaelstr...@gmail.com > <mailto:michaelstr...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> What do you think about this variation? > >> > >> Border.solid(Paint color, double width) -> > >> new Border(new BorderStroke(color, BorderStrokeStyle.SOLID, > >> null, new BorderWidths(width))) > >> > >> Border.dashed(Paint color, double width) -> > >> new Border(new BorderStroke(color, BorderStrokeStyle.DASHED, > >> null, new BorderWidths(width))) > >> > >> Border.dotted(Paint color, double width) -> > >> new Border(new BorderStroke(color, BorderStrokeStyle.DOTTED, > >> null, new BorderWidths(width))) > >> > >> Background.fill(Paint color) -> > >> new BackgroundFill(color, null, null) > >> > >> This gives developers a good deal of customizability before needing > to > >> fall back to using constructors. > >> > >> > >> Am Di., 8. Juni 2021 um 03:21 Uhr schrieb Nir Lisker > >> <nlis...@gmail.com <mailto:nlis...@gmail.com>>: > >> > > >> > The new API: > >> > > >> > 1. `Border.of(Paint stroke)` or `Border.stroke(Paint stroke)` > >> that does > >> > `new Border(new BorderStroke(Paint stroke , > >> BorderStrokeStyle.SOLID, null, > >> > null));` > >> > 2. `Background.of((Paint fill)` or `Background.fill(Paint fill)` > >> that does > >> > `new Background(new BackgroundFill(Paint fill, null, null));` > >> > > >> > I don't mind either name choice. > >> > > >> > > > >
