On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:15 GMT, Nir Lisker <nlis...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Added a utility method to run code on the FX thread if it's not already, and >> changed the animation methods to use it. > > Nir Lisker has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Update tests modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/animation/Animation.java line 909: > 907: * This method must be run on the JavaFX Application Thread. > 908: * > 909: * @see #playFromStartImpl(String) there is no such symbol. Do you mean `playFrom(String)`? modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/animation/Animation.java line 953: > 951: * This method must be run on the JavaFX Application Thread. > 952: * > 953: * @see #playFromStartImpl(Duration) there is no such symbol. Do you mean `playFrom(Duration)`? modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/animation/Animation.java line 989: > 987: * This method must be run on the JavaFX Application Thread. > 988: * > 989: * @see #playFromStartImpl() Do you mean `playFromStart()`? tests/system/src/test/java/test/com/sun/javafx/animation/AnimationTest.java line 2: > 1: /* > 2: * Copyright (c) 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Copyright header should keep 2023, even if it is almost completely changed tests/system/src/test/java/test/com/sun/javafx/animation/AnimationTimerTest.java line 2: > 1: /* > 2: * Copyright (c) 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Same, copyright header should keep 2023, even if it is almost completely changed ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1352#discussion_r1470098558 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1352#discussion_r1470099369 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1352#discussion_r1470090981 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1352#discussion_r1470088051 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1352#discussion_r1470088333
