On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 23:28:05 GMT, Andy Goryachev <ango...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> It will be much better after https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1644 :) > > can you apply the same treatment as in #1644? there at least it makes sense. I would say, lets merge https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1644 first and then it is automatically there when the conflict is solved ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1645#discussion_r1892574916
