On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:26:32 GMT, Martin Fox <m...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I think this PR should probably be accepted as-is. It fixes an obvious > problem and doesn't introduce any new ones. Someone should enter a follow-up > PR citing some of the other problems but most of those have been around for > years and only affect users who are looking for trouble ... I tend to agree, as long as any remaining problems are preexisting and not likely to be encountered in the primary use case. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1754#issuecomment-2839380724
