On Thu, 21 May 2026 23:03:26 GMT, Marius Hanl <[email protected]> wrote:
>> yep, the original test is broken on windows with this change. >> >> we shouldn't be changing test by replacing a legal sequence of events to an >> illegal one just to silence it. > > I must be blind - I thought that the test previously pressed and pressed > again. And was wondering what it tried to achieve - just realized that it was > press -> release. > > well, that is probably what happens if you name your test `test_rt_32869` and > let me guess what it does 🙃 point taken. Rindfleischetikettierungsüberwachungsaufgabenübertragungsgesetz :-) ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1935#discussion_r3284880248
