Den 05. aug. 2015 18:38, skrev [email protected]: >[email protected] wrote: >> Seems other LDAP servers have choosen 'etime' (see >> http://ludopoitou.com/2015/02/24/about-auditing-ldap-operations/). Why >> not try to use the same word? > > etime is fine with me. The other problem here is that it's counting duration > from when slapd received the request (which is fine) but usually the op gets > queued immediately after. For this etime to be useful we need to know both the > amount of time spent queued, and the amount of time spent actually executing. > qtime and etime?
It's total time which is interesting when looking for hot spots which need attention. So I suggest that plus either one of the others, or percentage of the total spent doing one of the others. -- Hallvard
