Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote: > Den 10. aug. 2015 14:41, skrev Hallvard Breien Furuseth: >> It's total time which is interesting when looking for hot spots >> which need attention. So I suggest that plus either one of the >> others, or percentage of the total spent doing one of the others. > > Sorry - total+one of the other was silly probably, it just > leaves us calculating the missing one when looking for that > one. Total + percentage of one of the others makes sense, > or (etime, qtime) since a high value still will stand out. > Yes, I prefer explicit (etime, qtime) - anyone who needs the total can add it up themselves.
-- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
