> Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: >> Howard Chu writes: >>> oprofile shows quite a bit more overhead in 2.4's ACL processing vs >>> 2.3's. I'm thinking of streamlining things a bit, along these lines. >>> Any thoughts? >> >> Only a few loose ones: >> >> A brief look shows some deep indirection, which may be harder for >> compilers to optimize due to possible aliasing among intervening writes. >> Maybe you should help by unpacking some more common expressions into >> local variables. > > Profiling showed that the ACLCHECK branch didn't have any improvement over > HEAD. Looks like it may not be worth the trouble.
Are you going to drop this? p.
