masar...@aero.polimi.it wrote: >> masar...@aero.polimi.it wrote: > >>> Are you going to drop this? >> >> Yes, doesn't seem to offer any real benefit. If you can think of some >> other >> reason to keep it, we can perhaps talk about how to make it viable. > > Not necessarily a request to revitalize it; having a compact, neutral > interface for access control arguments would ease extending access control > in the future, if needed.
True. I guess if there's no performance degradation (and it looks like not, the performance impact was zero) then we can go ahead and adopt it. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
