[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Splitting the above modification in two separate operations works >>> around that problem. >> What about using replace instead? > That causes the same behavior as the modification pasted above. So it > doesn't work as well.
Also, it might not be very practical if very complex indexing is in place... p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------
