On Montag, 26. Mai 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> Splitting the above modification in two separate operations works > >>> around that problem. > >> > >> What about using replace instead? > > > > That causes the same behavior as the modification pasted above. So > > it doesn't work as well. > > Also, it might not be very practical if very complex indexing is in > place... Yes. But I think I fixed the original issue now. (r1.39 of servers/slapd/back-bdb/attr.c)
-- Ralf
