[email protected] wrote: > progress seems a bit too generic; the names probably should be prefixed with > lutil. Also I suggest using "meter" instead of "progress". > > lutil-meter.h, meter.c.
Currently it's enabled by default. I have a feeling it should be disabled when various debug flags are set. Any thoughts? Would there ever be a situation where you want debug enabled *and* the progress meter enabled? -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
