----- "Howard Chu" <[email protected]> wrote: > Gavin Henry wrote: > > ----- [email protected] wrote: > > > >> [email protected] wrote: > >>> progress seems a bit too generic; the names probably should be > >> prefixed with > >>> lutil. Also I suggest using "meter" instead of "progress". > >>> > >>> lutil-meter.h, meter.c. > >> Currently it's enabled by default. I have a feeling it should be > >> disabled when > >> various debug flags are set. Any thoughts? Would there ever be a > >> situation > >> where you want debug enabled *and* the progress meter enabled? > > > > How would that work? The debug message would stream down your > console > > and then the meter would have to consistently return to the start of > the > > prompt/window to make any sense? Or would it would it switch to just > showing > > an elapsed time and the end of the run? > > > The messages would all be interleaved; it would be rather ugly.
Thought so. So off when debug is on make perfect sense to me. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. OpenLDAP Engineering Team. E [email protected] Community developed LDAP software. http://www.openldap.org/project/
