--On Thursday, March 02, 2017 10:36 PM +0000 [email protected] wrote: > I'm not sure if there is any guard against writing an older contextCSN > than is currently stored, but this could theoretically rewind the > stored contextCSN on A if there is any latency in replication from B.
Older contextCSNs will be ignored. And it is accurate to then have a contextCSN for each server in the system. That was part of the initial problem in 8281. I still see no evidence of incorrect behavior. ;) --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: <http://www.symas.com>
