--On Monday, March 06, 2017 5:24 PM +0000 [email protected] wrote:

> Reading back over the report on ITS-8281, the reported behavior would
> have been a collision of generating a new contextCSN as well as
> duplicating the producer's SID.  So it's generated contextCSN would
> have masked the one it never committed from the original master.

I'm not sure what you mean by duplicating the producer's SID.  Both nodes 
had unique SID values.  There were no duplicated SIDs.

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>




Reply via email to