> On Lun 21 novembre 2005 10:43, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: >> >>> Ok, so syncrepl does not seem to be a good idea in the case of two >>> masters >>> in different places. What about the case of two load-balanced masters? >> >> could you clarify the definition of "two load-balanced masters"? I >> don't >> think anything like that exists. > > I mean two LDAP servers which accept writing. In front of them you have a > load balancing mechanism (LVS or Alteon for example) which dispatches all > LDAP operations (reading and writing) on the two LDAP servers. All the > access of this cluster are done via the load balancer.
That's multimaster; I don't think syncrepl has any provision to deal with this configuration, as OpenLDAP is designed to work with a single master. Whatever perception a client has of that system, there are two masters. p. -- Pierangelo Masarati mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ing. Pierangelo Masarati Responsabile Open Solution SysNet s.n.c. Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ------------------------------------------ Office: +39.02.23998309 Mobile: +39.333.4963172 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------
