Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Saturday, February 09, 2008 10:45 AM -0800 Howard Chu<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
They need to be unique per *server*, not per database.
Oh, hm... I thought it was for helping identify a given syncrepl instance
in a server with multiple DBs. Certainly in 2.3, you could use the same
rid for syncrepl across multiple servers without issue. Is this a change
for 2.4?
You're misunderstanding, and no, this is not a change in 2.4 relative to 2.3.
"Unique per server" means every syncrepl instance in a given server must have
a unique rid.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
