Who is this Quanah guy who keeps coming out with the wrong info? ;) On 2/9/08, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Saturday, February 09, 2008 9:27 AM -0800 James Hartley > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ah very good.... The documentaion I read seems to imply the number was > > tied to the replica, > > ie if the slave one used rid 001 then slave2 would use rid002. > > > > According to your email > > > > I would need rid001 for database 1 and rid002 for database 2 in the > > conf file for slave 1 and if I had another slave, say slave2 I would > > need to have an rid003 and rid004. > > > > Thank you for clarifying this point. > > Keep replies on the list. And no, you are incorrect still. The RIDs need > to be unique per database, on a given replica. So rid001 and rid002 on > replica1, rid001 and rid002 on replica2, is just fine. > > --Quanah > > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Principal Software Engineer > Zimbra, Inc > -------------------- > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration >
-- Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com http://www.suretecsystems.com/services/openldap/
