--On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 5:40 PM +0200 Kolbjørn Barmen <[email protected]> wrote:

Perhaps slapadd/slapd should be able to deal with such duplicate entries
better, to make it more obivous what's wrong? I'm just saying :)


What options did you use with slapadd? If you used -q, this is probably expected. If you did not, I suggest filing an ITS, although slapadd is never really as strict as ldapadd will be. It is meant for loading LDIF created by an export, which should already be sane.

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Reply via email to