On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 5:40 PM +0200 Kolbjørn Barmen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Perhaps slapadd/slapd should be able to deal with such duplicate entries > > better, to make it more obivous what's wrong? I'm just saying :) > > > What options did you use with slapadd? If you used -q, this is probably > expected. If you did not, I suggest filing an ITS, although slapadd is > never really as strict as ldapadd will be. It is meant for loading LDIF > created by an export, which should already be sane.
I did not use -q. ITS submitted: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Incoming?id=6592 Thanks! :) -- Kolbjørn Barmen UNINETT Driftsenter
