Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > From what I see on the list, people who use normal syncrepl > do not have reliable replication.
Frankly this sounds scary! Especially since you have more knowledge of the internals here... :-/ > With delta-syncrepl, the changes are read directly out of a changes > database, in order. The gains are significant. IIRC with delta-syncrepl all write operations are serialized. Yes? Ciao, Michael.
